Re: 16 bit per sample support

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ewald R. de Wit: "Re: 16 bit per sample support"
• Previous message: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: 16 bit per sample support"
• In reply to: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: 16 bit per sample support"

Thanks for the explanation! Clearly the CPU overhead to do this in the
backend is utterly insignificant.

> > OTOH it would be nice to have simple access to the deep color data in
> > a unified 16 bit format. Perhaps in the longer run this would be
> > better.
>
> This is the idea. Keep the protocol simple for the _general_ case.

Ok, you have my vote (if I have one to begin with :-)

-- 
  --  Ewald



--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com





 Next message: Ewald R. de Wit: "Re: 16 bit per sample support"
 Previous message: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: 16 bit per sample support"
 In reply to: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: 16 bit per sample support"