Re: Snapscan 310

Ole W. Saastad (o.w.saastad@kjemi.uio.no)
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 15:33:40 +0100 (MET)

On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Nick Lamb wrote:

> Well, I doubt that this is a backend problem, unless the Snapscan actually
> supports 12-bit or 16-bit per sample scans.
>
> Your JPEG images make the visual problem immediately apparent, but it is
> very hard to decide exactly what the cause of the problem is once JPEG
> has destroyed (yes -- really, destroyed) large parts of the image detail.
> Can you make lossless compressed TIFF files available somehow?
>

Thank you,
I could mail you some scans, but the tiff files are large.
They does not compress very well with gzip so they remain large
even after gzip -9.

For a limites time I could put them on the www server you found
the jpg images.

Thanks agin.

Best regards Ole


--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com