David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> I see you're doing a great job with xsane. I'm very glad that you're
> doing this.
Thanks.
> May I ask what you think of adding GNOME support to xsane
> or is it GNOME-compliant already? I'm not much of a GUI person
> myself, but I do like the GNOME project a lot because I think they
> have shown good taste so far in what technology they adopt and how
> they structure the project
I already thought about making special versions or including special functions
for GNOME/KDE. But there are a lot of other things that are much more important
than that. I do not use KDE or GNOME and I do not know anything about their
protocols/special functions. But that is no big problem, I did not know much
about
GTK but step by step I learn what I need to know.
and don't forget windowmaker! I want --with-WINGs --next-look
configure options!
(or maybe it's time to sit the GNOME/KDE/etc people down and define a
generic windowmanager/client communication standard.... 8^) )
comments to /dev/null please...
-- Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie http://hibernia.clubi.ie PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt ------------------------------------------- Fortune: I'm not even going to *______bother* comparing C to BASIC or FORTRAN. -- L. Zolman, creator of BDS C
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com