> So, you can see that having a very controllable datasource would be
> helpful for debugging this sort of thing :-)
Yes. Actually the PNM backend was intended to be just that and a reference
implementation, from which it is far away as it is now.
> I could put in a predefined bitstream and know /precisely/ what the driver
> was going to give me :-)
> (Okay, okay, I know you're saying that I could get the same results with a
> well-known PNM and a driver without 'helpful additions' :-))
Yes, but go ahead. It never hurts to have more test programs.
We found quite some funny small bugs in some drivers with the netsane stuff,
so ...
CU, Andy
-- Andreas Beck | Email : <Andreas.Beck@ggi-project.org>
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com