Is a frame always a part of a single "image"? That is, I notice that
frames can be gray, RGB interleaved, or one of R, G, or B, which suggests
that it would take three frames to compose a single RGB image were the
backend spitting out R, G, B frames individually. But would I ever see a
backend spitting out multiple gray frames? For instance, if I had a camera
back end, spitting out so many frames per second?
Or is this just an unfortunate overloading of the word 'frame'?
If I have an automatic document feeder hooked up to my scanner, and the
user loads a bunch of docs and clicks "scan", with the ADF enabled, will
it require me to keep calling sane_start to retrieve subsequent pages? Or
will I have to call sane_cancel at the end of every page, then call
sane_start again?
Is it safe to assume that a single gray frame is one image, a single RGB
from is one image, and a set of R, G, and B frames is one image? Is it
ever possible that I would get a single R, G, or B frame on its own?
I just want to make sure I don't make any stupid assumptions in my Perl
wrapper :-)
Thanks for the help!
-- Tripp Lilley + Innovative Workflow Engineering, Inc. + (tripp@iweinc.com) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "So perl is like a graceful swan, gliding across a lake. But underneath the water, there's these little legs, paddling like buggery."-- beable van polasm in http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=440381254
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com