Re: Black Widow Scanners (Was "Does anybody recognize this inquiry information ?")

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: Pixels vs. Bytes per Line"
• Previous message: Jean-Baptiste Nivoit: "Re: your mail"
• In reply to: Dave Restall - System Administrator: "Black Widow Scanners (Was "Does anybody recognize this inquiry information ?")"

On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 08:17:39AM +0000, Dave Restall - System Administrator wrote:

[...]

> The inquiry result doesn't seem to follow the spec, the spec does say
> 0x02 for the response code, could you have transcribed the data
> incorrectly ?

No, the 0x01 is in there. I only wrapped the only original long line, and
added the byte count at the beginning of the lines to make it easier to
to read (and failed to add 8 to 80, if you read it carefully). But
the inquiry information is ok.

Bernd

-- 
Bernd Schroeder 
Email: mailto:bernd@aquila.muc.de
PGP public key available: mailto:pgp@aquila.muc.de | Subject: send key 

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com





 Next message: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: Pixels vs. Bytes per Line"
 Previous message: Jean-Baptiste Nivoit: "Re: your mail"
 In reply to: Dave Restall - System Administrator: "Black Widow Scanners (Was "Does anybody recognize this inquiry information ?")"