Matto> Just curious (for now):
Matto> From the multi-platform compatibility standpoint, is it ok for a
Matto> backend
Matto> to be implemented using Sys V shared memory IPC (instead of
Matto> pipes, as the connection to a child reader process)?
I'd suspect problems with the OS/2 port. I suppose for a
high-framerate camera or high-end scanner this might make sense
nevertheless, but for a normal flatbed scanner, I doubt you'd notice
any performance improvement.
--david
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com