Re: sane 0.72pre meets FreeBSD

Hugo van der Kooij (hvdkooij@caiw.nl)
Sun, 5 Apr 1998 22:28:22 +0200 (MET DST)

On Sun, 5 Apr 1998, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:

> Question 1:
>
> Is it necessary to keep all the loadable backends in the standard
> library path? I'm getting an uneasy feeling when sane singlehandedly
> doubles the number of entries in my /usr/local/lib, with something
> that could be considered as internal to sane.
>
> Am I missing something, or could they be moved to (for example)
> /usr/local/lib/sane/? Aren't the backends just dlopen()ed?

Aren't you at liberty to use another path? Just add the proper parameter
when runing ./configure should do the trick.

Hugo.

+------------------------+------------------------------+
| Hugo van der Kooij | Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl |
| Oranje Nassaustraat 16 | http://www.caiw.nl/~hvdkooij |
| 3155 VJ Maasland | (De man met de rode hoed) |
+------------------------+------------------------------+
"Computers let you make more mistakes faster than any other invention in
human history, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila."
(Mitch Radcliffe)

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com