Re: umax-backend

Jonathan A. Buzzard (jab@hex.prestel.co.uk)
Mon, 01 Sep 1997 13:45:46 +0100

R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl said:
> Yes, the q/a program will show "only noise" still, the doctors won't
> allow you to trhow away that information. Maybe if you average 4
> pixels together that you get a little information. This IS visible to
> the naked eye.....

Never said the radiologist would let you throw the info away, but noise
is noise and averaging bits together will (should)

> How do you measure the "just noise" in a 12bit scanner? I'd try to
> generate a perfect analog greyscale and scan that.

Not that I was involved in the q/a program, (it was an M.Sc. project done
at the same time as mime, and I had to use the same scanner for some
radiotherapy films). Roughly their was a test film which had a large number
of squares of different (but uniform) optical density. Roughly a scan was
taken of the film, a template was placed over the image and some statistics
where done on the pixels of the different areas. As far as I understood
the analysis showed that on a uniform area the distribution of the values
in the lower two bits was more or less uniform. The conclusions drawn from
that it must be noise.

JAB.

-- 
Jonathan A. Buzzard,
34 Kepwell Road, Prudhoe,           Email: jab@hex.prestel.co.uk
Northumberland. NE42 6PD              Tel: +44(0)1661-832195
United Kingdom

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.azstarnet.com/~axplinux/sane/
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe sane-devel-request@listserv.azstarnet.com